The details make the difference
AMD EPYC 3451 vs Intel Xeon E5-4667 v4 @ 2.20GHz
Comparing 2 of up to 6 processors side by side.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single core | 1,700 | 1,757 |
| Multicore | 19,532 | 20,319 |
| Estimated price | Not listed | $5,729 |
| Cores | 16 | 18 |
| Threads | 32 | 36 |
| Performance cores | Not listed | Not listed |
| Efficient cores | Not listed | Not listed |
| Turbo clock | 3 GHz | 2.9 GHz |
| Typical TDP | Not listed | 135 W |
| Socket | Not listed | FCLGA2011-3 |
| First seen | Q2 2023 | Q1 2021 |
How do the benchmark scores compare?
AMD EPYC 3451 has a PassMark single-core score of 1,700, compared with 1,757 for Intel Xeon E5-4667 v4 @ 2.20GHz. Intel Xeon E5-4667 v4 @ 2.20GHz has the higher score in this benchmark.
AMD EPYC 3451 has a PassMark multicore score of 19,532, compared with 20,319 for Intel Xeon E5-4667 v4 @ 2.20GHz. Intel Xeon E5-4667 v4 @ 2.20GHz has the higher score in this benchmark.
Single-core scores describe one thread; multicore scores describe aggregate CPU throughput. These results do not establish which CPU is faster in every application. Compare platform support and total upgrade cost before buying.
Sources and data freshness
- AMD EPYC 3451 on PassMark CPU Benchmarks. Data retrieved .
- Intel Xeon E5-4667 v4 @ 2.20GHz on PassMark CPU Benchmarks. Data retrieved .
The retrieval date records when Find Me a CPU collected the source data. It is not a benchmark test date. Prices are USD estimates from the source, converted for other currencies, rather than live retailer offers. Release / first seen means the CPU first appeared on PassMark charts, not necessarily its launch date.
Benchmark scores do not predict frame rates in a particular game. Typical TDP is a specification, not measured electricity use. A matching socket does not confirm motherboard support; check the manufacturer's CPU support list and BIOS requirements.
How our data and recommendations work