The details make the difference
AMD EPYC 8324PN 32-Core vs CIX P1 CD8180
Comparing 2 of up to 6 processors side by side.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single core | 1,232 | 1,376 |
| Multicore | 8,375 | 9,277 |
| Estimated price | Not listed | Not listed |
| Cores | 8 | 12 |
| Threads | 8 | 12 |
| Performance cores | Not listed | Not listed |
| Efficient cores | Not listed | Not listed |
| Turbo clock | 3 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| Typical TDP | 130 W | Not listed |
| Socket | Not listed | Not listed |
| First seen | Q2 2025 | Q2 2025 |
How do the benchmark scores compare?
AMD EPYC 8324PN 32-Core has a PassMark single-core score of 1,232, compared with 1,376 for CIX P1 CD8180. CIX P1 CD8180 has the higher score in this benchmark.
AMD EPYC 8324PN 32-Core has a PassMark multicore score of 8,375, compared with 9,277 for CIX P1 CD8180. CIX P1 CD8180 has the higher score in this benchmark.
Single-core scores describe one thread; multicore scores describe aggregate CPU throughput. These results do not establish which CPU is faster in every application. Compare platform support and total upgrade cost before buying.
Sources and data freshness
- AMD EPYC 8324PN 32-Core on PassMark CPU Benchmarks. Data retrieved .
- CIX P1 CD8180 on PassMark CPU Benchmarks. Data retrieved .
The retrieval date records when Find Me a CPU collected the source data. It is not a benchmark test date. Prices are USD estimates from the source, converted for other currencies, rather than live retailer offers. Release / first seen means the CPU first appeared on PassMark charts, not necessarily its launch date.
Benchmark scores do not predict frame rates in a particular game. Typical TDP is a specification, not measured electricity use. A matching socket does not confirm motherboard support; check the manufacturer's CPU support list and BIOS requirements.
How our data and recommendations work