The details make the difference
AMD EPYC Embedded 9654P vs Intel Xeon 696X
Comparing 2 of up to 6 processors side by side.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single core | 2,901 | 3,742 |
| Multicore | 116,927 | 104,974 |
| Estimated price | Not listed | $6,999 |
| Cores | 96 | 64 |
| Threads | 192 | 128 |
| Performance cores | Not listed | Not listed |
| Efficient cores | Not listed | Not listed |
| Turbo clock | Not listed | 4.6 GHz |
| Typical TDP | Not listed | 350 W |
| Socket | Not listed | FCLGA4710 |
| First seen | Q4 2025 | Q4 2025 |
How do the benchmark scores compare?
AMD EPYC Embedded 9654P has a PassMark single-core score of 2,901, compared with 3,742 for Intel Xeon 696X. Intel Xeon 696X has the higher score in this benchmark.
AMD EPYC Embedded 9654P has a PassMark multicore score of 116,927, compared with 104,974 for Intel Xeon 696X. AMD EPYC Embedded 9654P has the higher score in this benchmark.
Single-core scores describe one thread; multicore scores describe aggregate CPU throughput. These results do not establish which CPU is faster in every application. Compare platform support and total upgrade cost before buying.
Sources and data freshness
- AMD EPYC Embedded 9654P on PassMark CPU Benchmarks. Data retrieved .
- Intel Xeon 696X on PassMark CPU Benchmarks. Data retrieved .
The retrieval date records when Find Me a CPU collected the source data. It is not a benchmark test date. Prices are USD estimates from the source, converted for other currencies, rather than live retailer offers. Release / first seen means the CPU first appeared on PassMark charts, not necessarily its launch date.
Benchmark scores do not predict frame rates in a particular game. Typical TDP is a specification, not measured electricity use. A matching socket does not confirm motherboard support; check the manufacturer's CPU support list and BIOS requirements.
How our data and recommendations work