Skip to content

The details make the difference

AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS vs Intel Xeon 6357P

Comparing 2 of up to 6 processors side by side.

Back to index
2 of 6 selectedAMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HSIntel Xeon 6357P
Side-by-side metrics
Best available benchmark scores and lowest listed price are highlighted.
Metric
Single core3,9214,233
Multicore30,34530,759
Estimated priceNot listed$556
Cores88
Threads1616
Performance coresNot listedNot listed
Efficient coresNot listedNot listed
Turbo clock5.2 GHz5.4 GHz
Typical TDP45 W80 W
SocketFP7 FP7r2FCLGA1700
First seenQ3 2024Q4 2025

How do the benchmark scores compare?

AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS has a PassMark single-core score of 3,921, compared with 4,233 for Intel Xeon 6357P. Intel Xeon 6357P has the higher score in this benchmark.

AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS has a PassMark multicore score of 30,345, compared with 30,759 for Intel Xeon 6357P. Intel Xeon 6357P has the higher score in this benchmark.

Single-core scores describe one thread; multicore scores describe aggregate CPU throughput. These results do not establish which CPU is faster in every application. Compare platform support and total upgrade cost before buying.

AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS lists FP7 FP7r2; Intel Xeon 6357P lists FCLGA1700. Check the motherboard manufacturer's CPU support list and BIOS requirements. If the required platform changes, include motherboard, memory and cooling costs; the CPU price alone is not the full upgrade cost.

Sources and data freshness

The retrieval date records when Find Me a CPU collected the source data. It is not a benchmark test date. Prices are USD estimates from the source, converted for other currencies, rather than live retailer offers. Release / first seen means the CPU first appeared on PassMark charts, not necessarily its launch date.

Benchmark scores do not predict frame rates in a particular game. Typical TDP is a specification, not measured electricity use. A matching socket does not confirm motherboard support; check the manufacturer's CPU support list and BIOS requirements.

How our data and recommendations work