The details make the difference
CentaurHauls @2500MHz vs Intel Core i3-10100E @ 3.20GHz
Comparing 2 of up to 6 processors side by side.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single core | 1,381 | 2,296 |
| Multicore | 8,014 | 7,749 |
| Estimated price | Not listed | $125 |
| Cores | 8 | 4 |
| Threads | 8 | 8 |
| Performance cores | Not listed | Not listed |
| Efficient cores | Not listed | Not listed |
| Turbo clock | Not listed | 3.8 GHz |
| Typical TDP | Not listed | 65 W |
| Socket | Not listed | FCLGA1200 |
| First seen | Q2 2022 | Q4 2021 |
How do the benchmark scores compare?
CentaurHauls @2500MHz has a PassMark single-core score of 1,381, compared with 2,296 for Intel Core i3-10100E @ 3.20GHz. Intel Core i3-10100E @ 3.20GHz has the higher score in this benchmark.
CentaurHauls @2500MHz has a PassMark multicore score of 8,014, compared with 7,749 for Intel Core i3-10100E @ 3.20GHz. CentaurHauls @2500MHz has the higher score in this benchmark.
Single-core scores describe one thread; multicore scores describe aggregate CPU throughput. These results do not establish which CPU is faster in every application. Compare platform support and total upgrade cost before buying.
Sources and data freshness
- CentaurHauls @2500MHz on PassMark CPU Benchmarks. Data retrieved .
- Intel Core i3-10100E @ 3.20GHz on PassMark CPU Benchmarks. Data retrieved .
The retrieval date records when Find Me a CPU collected the source data. It is not a benchmark test date. Prices are USD estimates from the source, converted for other currencies, rather than live retailer offers. Release / first seen means the CPU first appeared on PassMark charts, not necessarily its launch date.
Benchmark scores do not predict frame rates in a particular game. Typical TDP is a specification, not measured electricity use. A matching socket does not confirm motherboard support; check the manufacturer's CPU support list and BIOS requirements.
How our data and recommendations work