The details make the difference
Intel Celeron J4025 @ 2.00GHz vs ZHAOXIN KaiXian [email protected]+GHz
Comparing 2 of up to 6 processors side by side.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single core | 1,118 | 784 |
| Multicore | 1,455 | 1,597 |
| Estimated price | Not listed | Not listed |
| Cores | 2 | 4 |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Performance cores | Not listed | Not listed |
| Efficient cores | Not listed | Not listed |
| Turbo clock | 2.9 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| Typical TDP | 10 W | Not listed |
| Socket | FCBGA1090 | Not listed |
| First seen | Q1 2020 | Q3 2024 |
How do the benchmark scores compare?
Intel Celeron J4025 @ 2.00GHz has a PassMark single-core score of 1,118, compared with 784 for ZHAOXIN KaiXian [email protected]+GHz. Intel Celeron J4025 @ 2.00GHz has the higher score in this benchmark.
Intel Celeron J4025 @ 2.00GHz has a PassMark multicore score of 1,455, compared with 1,597 for ZHAOXIN KaiXian [email protected]+GHz. ZHAOXIN KaiXian [email protected]+GHz has the higher score in this benchmark.
Single-core scores describe one thread; multicore scores describe aggregate CPU throughput. These results do not establish which CPU is faster in every application. Compare platform support and total upgrade cost before buying.
Sources and data freshness
- Intel Celeron J4025 @ 2.00GHz on PassMark CPU Benchmarks. Data retrieved .
- ZHAOXIN KaiXian [email protected]+GHz on PassMark CPU Benchmarks. Data retrieved .
The retrieval date records when Find Me a CPU collected the source data. It is not a benchmark test date. Prices are USD estimates from the source, converted for other currencies, rather than live retailer offers. Release / first seen means the CPU first appeared on PassMark charts, not necessarily its launch date.
Benchmark scores do not predict frame rates in a particular game. Typical TDP is a specification, not measured electricity use. A matching socket does not confirm motherboard support; check the manufacturer's CPU support list and BIOS requirements.
How our data and recommendations work